Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Georgia Aquarium - Giant Grouper edit.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Georgia Aquarium - Giant Grouper edit.jpg, not featured
[edit]- Info Taken by Diliff - Edited and uploaded by Fir0002 - nominated by Tomer T --Tomer T 10:14, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Tomer T 10:14, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
SupportOppose for original --Luc Viatour 12:50, 24 April 2007 (UTC)- Support Nice one. --che 13:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Support nice! -- Freestyle nl (talk) 15:14, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Amrum 19:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - the original Image:Georgia Aquarium - Giant Grouper.jpg is already a featured pic. Not sure I see the value in putting up an edit as a candidate as well - MPF 19:49, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I don't see the point of having two versions of the same picture. We should be voting to replace the picture. In fact, the guideline say, "Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with the higher score of votes." So I guess if this one gets more than 15 support vote, we replace the current one, otherwise there is not much point in voting.--Digon3 01:23, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment It certainly looks nicer for having the rock removed. I don't know if it increases or decreases the 'value' of the photo. Probably both to different people, for different reasons. Regards, Ben Aveling 22:13, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose I like neither this edit nor the original image. --norro 07:30, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose I prefer the original with the rock - MPF 11:18, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose - Idem. Alvesgaspar 11:29, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see strong mitigating reasons for size for either version. --Digon3 12:51, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose I prefer it with the rock; also, too small.--MichaelMaggs 16:25, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Urban 16:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose If original picture is already a featured, I do not see any reason for discussion about smaller part of it. --Karelj 19:10, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose The original picture is perfectly fine and there is no compelling reason for the rock to be removed, thus making the altered picture artificial. -- Ram-Man 21:10, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose As above: Both are small; but the original version looks better. --Javier ME 22:00, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
result: 5 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 06:48, 9 May 2007 (UTC)