Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Český Krumlov (Krummau) - panorama - old city.JPG

Image:Český Krumlov (Krummau) - panorama - old city.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2011 at 11:38:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/Image:Český Krumlov (Krummau) - panorama - old city.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Český Krumlov (Krummau) - panorama - old city.JPG

•  Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 11:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pudelek (talk) 11:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral -- Nice view, but the picture is very shadowy. Besides that, if this was a stitched panorama (there's no metadata), Wikimedia standards are very high. This picture is only 3,64 Mb.Paolostefano1412 (talk) 15:31, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

  and so what that only 3,64? this is not a determinant --Pudelek (talk) 09:28, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

  It might be too compressed.--G Furtado (talk) 11:30, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

   Oppose With 4MP, 3.64 MB is not too small in general, if only file size is considered. But in this case user G Furtado is right: Details are washed out by noise reduction artifacts and compression, even at the obviously downscaled resolution of 4 MP. --JRff (talk) 12:48, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment This is just my advice for you, don't take it the wrong way... but answering "so what? This is not determinant" to a users comment is not going to get you many positive votes. That doesn't sound too kind. There're other ways to discuss opinions. Good luck with that. Paolostefano1412 (talk) 14:50, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:21, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too dark for me. --Karelj (talk) 14:37, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:23, 16 October 2011 (UTC)