Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View of the Church of the Savior on Blood.jpg

File:View of the Church of the Savior on Blood.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2016 at 23:13:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:View of the Church of the Savior on Blood.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View of the Church of the Savior on Blood.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 23:13, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 23:13, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support good work, but - for motifs like those - the next lens I want to have is a T/S. 45mm or 17mm. --Hubertl 23:41, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 00:39, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Beautiful, yes, but just too processed, especially at the upper edge. Daniel Case (talk) 01:49, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Taken too close to the building so the extreme wide-angle perspective is uncomfortable. File:Собор Воскресения Христова 1.jpg shows the building in better proportions and point-of-view (though the tree covers some of it, such is life). -- Colin (talk) 12:29, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
  • It's the view from a boat on the Griboyedov Canal. It's impressive, you bet. I could upload an alternative version with no perspective correction --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:25, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
    • I'm sure it is impressive in real life, in 3D, but it looks odd in 2D from this angle and with the perspective correction. I'm not sure an uncorrected version would pass FP either. Your other File:View of the Church of the Savior on Blood from the Griboedov Canal.jpg has better distance, though it is tilted and seems a bit soft at the top. -- Colin (talk) 21:18, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Looks rather grey and flat, and the close and low point of view is suboptimal indeed. — Julian H.^✈ 13:28, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:36, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)