Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View from Stpeters.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Feb 2011 at 18:07:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Wjh31 - uploaded by Wjh31 - nominated by Thomas888b -- Thomas888b (talk) 18:07, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Thomas888b (talk) 18:07, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose This picture so much shows what not to do... Numerous stitching errors, with many even visible on the thumbnails (oh my god the bottom part), some OOF shots, some exposures inconsistencies. It has it all (including a very impressive view ;) ). - Benh (talk) 22:59, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose the ugly bottom.--Claus (talk) 08:08, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: is an example of what should not be nominated | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
W.S. 10:48, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- Commentdidn't notice any stitching errors? I admit the bottom bit isn't great, maybe it could be cropped? Thomas888b (talk) 18:04, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- There are ghosts all over the bottom, take another look. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 22:44, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, crop the bottom. Also, could those who have spotted those stitching errors annotate them, please?--Snaevar (talk) 13:02, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- I added some of the more obvious ones I saw and some things I was suspicious of. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 17:03, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- The majority of stitching errors would not be visible if the bottom was cropped. Thomas888b (talk) 17:25, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
- Commentdidn't notice any stitching errors? I admit the bottom bit isn't great, maybe it could be cropped? Thomas888b (talk) 18:04, 17 February 2011 (UTC)