Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Viagem inaugural do VLT carioca 02.jpg

File:Viagem inaugural do VLT carioca 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2016 at 17:55:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Viagem inaugural do VLT carioca 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Viagem inaugural do VLT carioca 02.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
•  Info created by Fernando Frazão/Agência Brasil - uploaded by NMaia - nominated by NMaia -- ~★ nmaia ^{[[mia diskuto]]} 17:55, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- ~★ nmaia ^{[[mia diskuto]]} 17:55, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Nice photo though not perfect (lower right is unsharp). What kind of vehicle is this? A tram? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:45, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek: It's a VLT ("Veículo leve sobre trilhos" – light rail vehicle), inaugurated in Rio de Janeiro as part of the Olympic works. For more information, see pt:VLT do Rio de Janeiro. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:48, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Different and striking. Daniel Case (talk) 20:16, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:38, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Original --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:39, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 22:27, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Though agree with Kekek, and have some perspective problem but I like it. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 17:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose To be honest, I don't understand why it should be featured on Commons. --A.Savin 23:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment - The answer would be that it's an interesting composition that's pretty and sufficiently well executed for a feature, but obviously you don't see it that way; no wow for you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:47, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

I recognize that it's quite a creative composition, but for featurability on Commons (albeit, no idea how handled in local FPC's on wikipedia), minimal educational value should be there, which I fail to see here. --A.Savin 14:59, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Any good photo has educational value per se. This is a photography site, not just an adjunct to an encyclopedia. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

+1 -Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:56, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose sorry, but I can't do anything with it. Too narrow, strong distortion, not a very creative composition. It's a funny idea either but the very dark reflecting surface doesn't expand the image impression. The vanishing point is not set optimal too. --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 17:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles