Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tsurumi riverbank.jpg
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2021 at 02:22:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Natural
Info - The riverbank along the Tsurumi River in Tsurumi Ward, Yokohama, with gabion rocks lined up in the groin, protecting the embankment from erosion and providing a habitat for ducks and birds. all by Dandy1022 (talk) 07:08, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Support --—
Comment - I will greatly appreciate your comment and will be the basis for my next involvement in these challenges. Dandy1022 (talk) 06:51, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The perspective needs to be corrected (vertical lines are not vertical here), there is relatively strong CA (chromatic aberration) on the buildings on both upper sides, there are blown areas on the beach, and I think the image its oversaturated. Hopefully, this helps. Please try Quality images first. Regards, --Cayambe (talk) 08:45, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment - Thanks for your feedback, which I can liken to an expert description. I will improve on the next challenge.Dandy1022 (talk) 09:46, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment By the way, I wouldn't call this a natural place. It's a cityscape. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:09, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 |
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: The quality is not meeting most of the QI criteria. --A.Savin 21:24, 7 April 2021 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
Comment - Although voting for my participation closed early, I thought I could ask for more guidance from others, in Cayambe’s comments about “strong chromatic aberration” if anyone still cares, how can I correct it for my next participation. I apologize for asking for more opinions and thank you all for taking the time here. - Dandy1022 (talk) 00:25, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- I've left a message on Dandy1022's talk page so we can consider this nomination closed. Other thoughts/advice welcome there. — Rhododendrites talk | 00:48, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Strong oppose Extreme poor quality and uninteresting composition RolfHill (talk) 18:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- @RolfHill: no need to oppose after {{FPX}} has been added. it will close unless someone challenges the early closure. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- It also delays the automated closure of the nomination, since that takes place during the first Bot run 24 hours after the last time-stamped post. So it will be up for a day longer unless someone closes it manually. (Yes, my post will delay it further.) --Cart (talk) 22:38, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - I am grateful to those who opposed who gave me more lessons to improve in the future and especially to those who gave good advice, I will remember it. I apologize for submitting a poor-quality photo, probably due to the poor quality camera and software I use. I still allowed others to comment before it finally closed. - Dandy1022 (talk) 04:10, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- No need to apologize! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:07, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
