Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spider vs Fly.jpg

File:Spider vs Fly.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2011 at 09:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Spider vs Fly.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spider vs Fly.jpg

•  Info created by DerkArts - uploaded by DerkArts - nominated by DerkArts -- Derkarts (talk) 09:35, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Derkarts (talk) 09:35, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Sorry, account not old enough (10 days and 50 edits necessary to vote) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
    •  Comment Dear DerkArts: I regret to inform you that your account is a "suspicious account" [[1]]due to the fact that it is either less than 10 days old or you don´t have 50 edits, or both, therefore you cannot vote in your own nomination. You must do hard time by waiting 10 days and do at least 50 edits, meaningless if you want. After you comply with the rules, you may cross over to the camp of the not suspicious accounts. Regards.--Tomascastelazo (talk) 20:31, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
    • 11>9 -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 15:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, the image quality is poor (too much noise) and the species is not identified -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment I've uploaded a new version with some more noise reduction, also, I know it's part of the Salticidae, but not sure what sub-species exactly, was hoping an expert could identify it.

•  Comment -- The problem here is the too high ISO settings. Please take a look at our FP gallery (here) and at this picture in particular, to see what kind of quality is expected. Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:19, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

• Come on Alves. You are scaring him away --Muhammad (talk) 13:10, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
• If you use that image as reference I see only one picture on this entire page that would qualify to be a featured image, and you could scrap almost the entire featured image list, because there are very few that can hold up to that standard. But Alas.--Derkarts (talk) 13:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

 Support This is a fine and featurable image. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:39, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

•  Support --Muhammad (talk) 01:38, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose The II animal (not the spider) isn't on focus... I cannot even recognize it... --Llorenzi (talk) 15:56, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Llorenzi--Citron (talk) 08:35, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 17:22, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Alvesgaspar. W.S. 07:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Llorenzi.--Snaevar (talk) 23:36, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I like the foreboding composition - well-done. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 21:06, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:06, 19 March 2011 (UTC)