Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ringkøbing14.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Ringkøbing14.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2012 at 19:17:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info all by Wladyslaw Info I am not a specialist in fauna. If you can precise what kind of gull this animal is feel free to put it in a better category. Thank you. -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:17, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:17, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support XMICHCIOx (talk) 19:45, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Joydeep (talk) 09:40, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Discussion leading to succesful identification of the gull |
---|
* Comment Although I appreciate nominations from the Denmark , aren't you exceeding the max two active nominations limit here? --Slaunger (talk) 20:21, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
|
- Oppose sorry I just have to say "no wow", but I couldn't express my thoughts any better :) :( Tomer T (talk) 10:46, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose composition nice, I like it! But the gull is partialy overexposed and concealed for an featured image for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:17, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- (1) the gull is not overexposed, either full nor partially (2) this is not a documentary picture for a fauna textbook so the partially (!) hidden gull is no problem to be a FP --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:51, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Crop (40 % are unnecessary). --Yikrazuul (talk) 17:22, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- this picture needs "space" for aesthetic reason similar to this one File:Toronto - ON - Schaft des CN Tower.jpg --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:51, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Agree with Wladyslaw that this is not a bird profile and the need of space in an artistic composition. But I prefer more space at bottom to see a bit more of the pole (?) or even a portrait composition to get a more artistic feel. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 07:56, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:21, 10 August 2012 (UTC)