Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pterocnemia pennata head Edinburgh Zoo.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Pterocnemia pennata head Edinburgh Zoo.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2014 at 15:17:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by William Warby - uploaded by Bruce1ee - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 15:17, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 15:17, 9 January 2014 (UTC)- Support Tomer T (talk) 21:04, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Oppose I am not fully convinced about the DoF (but not the main reason for oppose). But the photo is definitely too dark, look at the histogram. approx. +0.8/+1.0 in LR. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:21, 10 January 2014 (UTC
Comment According to guidelines: Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Definitely not too dark. --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 08:12, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Surely can an image be on the low side of the tonal curve but it depends on the motive. With this motive I see no obvious reason for a tonal curve with an emphasis on the low side. Please load this image into any good image editing programm and make your own judgement and do not only cite the image guidelines to argue against my assessment. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support Dof field is shallow and perfect here. Nice and sharp. --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 08:12, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:18, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support --H. Krisp (talk) 21:39, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose I like the composition but really miss a tick of sharpness, especially in the eye and peak, sorry, Poco2 21:32, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Ricardo Esteban Gutierrez (talk) 15:42, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
