Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pat-carey.jpg

File:Pat-carey.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2016 at 06:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Pat-carey.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pat-carey.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
•  Info created by Imasku - uploaded by Imasku - nominated by Imasku -- T Heart 06:53, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- T Heart 06:53, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Also not very sharp to my eyes. As a musician, I'd like to support these photos, but I don't find them to be at FP level. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:32, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: , did you mean to oppose? Daniel Case (talk) 15:55, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Yes. Thanks for catching that error. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:51, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Not sharp enough and very noisy. The bottom crop is a bit unfortunate. Sorry. --Cayambe (rest of sig broken by edit)
•  Oppose Mot sharp enough. Did @Ikan Kekek: mean to support? Charles (talk) 08:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

• Please see explanation on your first photo. w.carter-Talk 15:30, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose per others. Quality way too low for such a small image. --Kreuzschnabel 14:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose for the same reasons as the first photo. w.carter-Talk 15:30, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Strong oppose per others. Poor technically and not really that striking a composition. Daniel Case (talk) 15:55, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

too unsharp you must be joking, not hard to tell your not a trained photographer.T Heart 13:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC) I am not opposing my own nomination... as stated obviously these images are being graded by untrained photographers T Heart 16:54, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

What a pity you’re the only trained photographer in here. Btw, may we see some samples of your work to adore? --Kreuzschnabel 17:11, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per others. INeverCry 19:55, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

yes I did look at the sample and as stated about.... its all raw image and then photoshop photography, to get the effect. That's not skill that's photoshop. That is my point, without photoshop that image would not have the colours it does. Most photographers today have no clue what 'real photography' is as they do not know how to do it unless its photoshop. I am not from that era I am a trained photographer to use my skill. Most photographers today if they had to just 'use their skill' would fail badly at images. Thank youT Heart 13:43, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Kreuzschnabel Did not say I am the only trained photographer, one of the few that uses trained skill not photoshop photography, there is a difference. The lighthouse below is my work and it has been disallowed. Last time I will submit my work. Enough of wiki. Thank you T Heart 13:43, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Jee 04:53, 31 August 2016 (UTC)