Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panoramica da Rampa do Vale do Pati.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2014 at 19:09:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created and uploaded by Carlos Perez Couto - nominated by Arion -- 
ArionEstar (talk) 19:09, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Support -- ArionEstar (talk) 19:09, 22 August 2014 (UTC)- Support -- I would like the photo to be sharper still, especially at long distances, but I like the composition and my feeling is it is a successful photo. Ariadacapo (talk) 20:42, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Oppose It's a beautiful landscape and a good shooting position. But IMHO post-processing it not good here. The sky looks oversaturated and the clarity (micro-contrast) is overdone and there are too many very dark areas. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:50, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Tuxyso: It's fixable? ArionEstar (talk) 13:11, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- @ArionEstar it might be fixable, but I think only in RAW. If you can provide the single RAW shots I can try to stitch a better version. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:03, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Tuxyso: How so single RAW shots? ArionEstar (talk) 15:18, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- @ArionEstar: If you take a look on the resolution (7,139 × 2,320 pixels) it can never be a single shot. According to the EXIF data the images come from a Nikon D90 with a 12 Mpx sensor. Thus you need multiple RAW files to stitch such a pano. The image editing (processing of RAW files, contract corrections etc.) is overdone here. So I think the best idea is to take the RAW files, develop them in a reasonable way and stitch a new panoramic photo. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:24, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Tuxyso: Then this will be spoken to the author of the photo, and he does not seem to be very active on Commons. ArionEstar (talk) 15:42, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Tuxyso: Then this will be spoken to the author of the photo, and he does not seem to be very active on Commons.
- @ArionEstar: If you take a look on the resolution (7,139 × 2,320 pixels) it can never be a single shot. According to the EXIF data the images come from a Nikon D90 with a 12 Mpx sensor. Thus you need multiple RAW files to stitch such a pano. The image editing (processing of RAW files, contract corrections etc.) is overdone here. So I think the best idea is to take the RAW files, develop them in a reasonable way and stitch a new panoramic photo. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:24, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Tuxyso: How so single RAW shots?
- @ArionEstar it might be fixable, but I think only in RAW. If you can provide the single RAW shots I can try to stitch a better version. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:03, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Tuxyso: It's fixable?
I withdraw my nomination ArionEstar (talk) 22:52, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
