Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pacific Tree Frog (Pseudacris regilla) 3.JPG

File:Pacific Tree Frog (Pseudacris regilla) 3.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 11:09:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Pacific Tree Frog (Pseudacris regilla) 3.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pacific Tree Frog (Pseudacris regilla) 3.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians#Family : Hylidae (Tree Frogs
•  Info created & uploaded by The High Fin Sperm Whale - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 11:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose low resolution and technical quality in general compared to what is already at Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians.--BevinKacon (talk) 11:25, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Small and unimpressive. Tomer T, please make sure to look at existing, and especially fairly recent FPs in the same category that you're thinking of nominating in. This is not close at all to an FP, nor do I consider it a QI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:37, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Ikan Kekek, what are you trying to suggest? Tomer T (talk) 12:47, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

• Exactly what I said. What part of what I suggested was unclear? If you're already looking at existing FPs in each category, especially recent ones, before each nomination you make, I don't know what to suggest. It's clear that a bunch of your nominations are being voted down as below FP standards, right? So I'm trying to make a helpful suggestion that would help you avoid suffering the same fate repeatedly, but if it's not helpful to you, OK, whatever. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

• I just reviewed your nominations since the beginning of October. You've made a number of terrific nominations that were clear FPs, and I was conflating some other people's nominations with some of yours. Still, there have been some other cases of nominations that were judged to be below standards or borderline. Anyway, I mean no disrespect. I've made at least my share of nominations that mystified others as much as this one mystifies me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:01, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

• Ikan Kekek, I've been nominating pictures in the last few years, and made a lot of successful nominations. You can look at my user page to view all my successfully nominated images over the years, 349 until now, not many users made more successful nominations. Sometimes there are unsuccessful nominations, even one after the other, it's inevitable, and I suppose that the standards may have grown higher throughout the years. But there was some tone of contempt from your first comment indeed. I always learn from the comments on my nominations, there's no need to send me to browse through the tens of thousands of Commons FPs. And I can handle with unsuccessful nominations. Tomer T (talk) 13:58, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

• I was just suggesting to look at FPs in the same category (in this case, of frogs), but I apologize for my initial tone, which was indeed unwarranted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Quality too low and composition/perspective too uninteresting to make up for the small image size. IOW: Not too bad but not enough wow to feature either IMHO. --Kreuzschnabel 15:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 21:10, 10 November 2019 (UTC)