Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Notre Dame Paris portail du Cloître tympan.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Notre Dame Paris portail du Cloître tympan.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jan 2011 at 11:13:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by Jebulon.
Tympanum of the "Closter Gate", Northern façade of Notre-Dame de Paris. Two levels above: Legend of Theophilus, Level below (lintel): Birth and childhood of Jesus, according to Matthew's Gospel. "Comics" of the 13th century -- Jebulon (talk) 11:13, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Support -- Jebulon (talk) 11:13, 8 January 2011 (UTC)- Support --Snaevar (talk) 12:43, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:30, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support --George Chernilevsky talk 16:50, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:53, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Oppose ouch, such framing with the top (and base) of the arch cropped, it does hurt. --Elekhh (talk) 07:49, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Good point, it was a great dilemma to me, but the subject is the tympanum, not the arch, please don't be hurt ! As I wanted to show details of the sculptures and the stories telled, I was compeled to stay as close of the subject as possible, and a framing with more angels would be disturbing in my opinion. --Jebulon (talk) 10:40, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose I am sorry, slight tilt / distortion, loss of sharpness in the edges, the crop doesn't convince me, and it's lacking the wow I'd expect for an FP. -- H005 23:55, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- No need to be sorry. No worries. Thanks for reviewing and feedback anyway.--Jebulon (talk) 09:39, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree, sorry. Quality (unsharpness, noisy) and composition (framing, perspective (-> distortions)) aren't featured. But, I do not miss the WOW effect. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:23, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Question tilt?--Claus (talk) 12:23, 12 January 2011 (UTC)- Support --Paris 16 (talk) 16:58, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. regards, PETER WEIS TALK 11:22, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful artwork, well captured and annotated. I would also like to see a wider view, but the crop seems sensible given the photographer's intent. The minor tilt/distortion and lack of sharpness in the corners are tolerable IMO. --Avenue (talk) 12:19, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 11:59, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
