Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Medieval windows of Duomo (Gubbio).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Medieval windows of Duomo (Gubbio).jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2015 at 00:52:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Support Wonderful. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 10:22, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Every sharp photographs of stained glass windows from inside a church are visually appealing, they are made for this purpose. Therefore FP ? Not sure... This one needs serious crops left and right IMO, and I'm not certain it is a full "medieval" one... Some parts look very modern. The subject by itself is not extraordinary, and the technical realization is...decent, but nothing more. I'll wait a bit before voting.--Jebulon (talk) 09:17, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The window is medieval then there are the parties of the 1800 I do not think I need to explain what it means to a window, cut right? But when ever ...Even your photos of Athens was "decent" and not too interesting but my education in not just say you see that is different from yours. Next time I will be much more exhaustive. An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. Clin--LivioAndronico (talk) 09:51, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • If one think a material is not featurable, he should oppose and not be afraid to hurt a contributor's feeling (just oppose in a polite way ;) ). We should stop thinking "he opposed me last time, I'm going to oppose back" or "I won't oppose his, so he won't oppose mine later". This won't work. Maybe why FPC should be anonymous. - Benh (talk) 10:03, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nothing not polite in my comment. I don't feel "superior" nor express rudeness or something stupid like that. I don't vote NOW for personal technical reasons: because I'm only on my Ipad and not with a normal monitor, so an oppose in this case would be unfair. Anyway, I can see that the subject is not centered. Furthermore, there is no explanations nowhere about what we are seeing. I've been obliged to add a category... But who are the persons ? What are the coats of arms ? No geolocation neither...Unsufficient for a FP candidate. And please, stop to personalize any comment you disagree with. If you will oppose my next candidacies just because they are my candidacies, please feel free, but... Well...--Jebulon (talk) 20:43, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • In fact the peasants NOT KNOW TO BE RUDE BECAUSE DON'T KNOW THE EDUCATION. Then I'll explain the etiquette, saying that something is decent is rude especially when producing photos painful as yours. The symbols of the saints above, but I must also explain how you eat? Put all the categories that you want is not my problem. If their fifties are having fun ... so who am I to judge? (because I'm educated!) I do not object because they are new but because they are painful .... think this --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:08, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per Jebulon. I don't even think it's detailed enough (won't talk about sharpness but focus on detail) as we can't read the words at the bottom. I think we should be very demanding (technically) on such static and accessible subjects. They have no external influence like weather, crowd, amount of light, accessibility (in the sense that they are not found in remote locations)... - Benh (talk) 19:24, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I tried again, and really can't read the ones at the bottom on the sides... I don't have any idea of what can be written there, so I can't guess. Guessing because you have knowledge of the topic doesn't count ;) - Benh (talk) 21:25, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Medieval_windows_of_Duomo_(Gubbio).jpg&oldid=166854508"