Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:MatsaluSuitsuJõgi.jpg

File:MatsaluSuitsuJõgi.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2014 at 10:46:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:MatsaluSuitsuJõgi.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:MatsaluSuitsuJõgi.jpg

•  Info created and uploaded by Urmas Haljaste - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 10:46, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 10:46, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Tamba52 (talk) 16:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice environmental portrait. You might get some complaints about tilt but with old buildings it is not so relevant. Saffron Blaze (talk) 17:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment similar FP for reference. Jee 05:29, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

• Same shit different day. --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 09:29, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
• That's odd. Is it just flipped? Saffron Blaze (talk) 05:48, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose Looking at the satellite map and the image... this one is flopped image of the same place. --Ivar (talk) 06:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment It is a photograph, not a photocopy. Yes, it is flipped. I think it looks better this way. --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 08:57, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Flip doesn't represent reality => clearly disqualifies from FP, and btw the geocode seems incorrect. --A.Savin 09:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Reduced educational value; maybe suitable to describe Flipped image. Other similar stuff already FP. Jee 10:32, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

 Comment I didn't know that. Some of my other FPs are also flipped. I will start to delist them. --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 10:50, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment Just flip them back then. Why to cause trouble? And why to flip them in the first place? Kruusamägi (talk) 14:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

• Yes; just flip them back. I see no need for a mass delist. Jee 15:16, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

COM:OVERWRITE? --A.Savin 15:25, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

It is a point; but if FPC community accept it, I see no problem. Anyway better wait till POTY ends. Jee 15:57, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

• In this case this is the correct flip and better processed. A delist and replace wold be suitable here. Saffron Blaze (talk) 17:53, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
• It will never happen. --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 18:07, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

  Yes, any other user can unflip them but can you be sure the images really are flipped? Even if you tried to locate the places you probably would not be able to recognize the views in nature. This shows how absurd the discussion really is. The sequence of trees or stones doesn't matter. It is not a deception. There are no heritage protection object in these pictures. The flip does not change the nature, the atmosphere nor the quality of the site. I don't know about you but I'm not a google street-view photographer and I'm not environmental copyist. Since my work doesn't fit yours standard, I will not contribute anymore. It must be a relief to many of you. Wish you all the best. -- (unsigned)

•  Oppose If this one is flipped copy of existing FP (just positioned very slightly different) then I'm annoyed the nominator has tried to fool us into promoting two nearly identical pictures at FP. -- Colin (talk) 12:38, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

• @Colin: Note, here the nominator is different. Jee 12:49, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Didn't spot that. Still, having two mirror images will lead to these mistakes. Which is why I also don't support requesting the "original" be uploaded in cases where the flip doesn't matter. -- Colin (talk) 13:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

This one is different as there is an existing FP of the same image. This should not have been nominated. However, it is my opinion this is a superior edit. Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:49, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment I don't know about the satellite image but I have actually been at Suitsu and it seems to me that this one is truthful and the other picture is flipped. But I could be wrong. This one just seems more genuine. I guess satellites never lie. In either case, I don't feel deceived. --Rutake (talk) 09:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

 Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 14:25, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 16:54, 28 February 2014 (UTC)