Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jielbeaumadier gorilla gorilla gorilla femelle madrid 2014.jpeg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2016 at 23:21:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
- Info created by, uploaded by, nominated by Jiel -- Jiel (talk) 23:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Jiel (talk) 23:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - Hi, Jiel. I've noticed that you've contributed a lot of Valued Images, so I'm glad to see you participating here, but unfortunately, I don't see this as a featurable picture. One reason is that the light is unpleasant to me. Surprisingly, Commons Category:Gorilla contains no Featured Pictures of live gorillas, but I think this is the best Quality Image of a gorilla. I'm not sure I'd vote to feature it if it were nominated, because I dislike the bokeh, but look at the composition, which I find to be a much clearer example of a portrait, with better light, and a more expressive facial expression. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:02, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Hi Ikan Kekek, thanks for you comment and explanation. I will try to make and to submit even better photographs. Jiel (talk) 08:59, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - I'll look forward to that. I'm an admin at Wikivoyage, which is how I got turned on to Commons in the first place. I've inserted thumbnails of a number of your Valued Images into Wikivoyage articles. So thank you for those photos! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:06, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Hi Ikan Kekek, thanks for you comment and explanation. I will try to make and to submit even better photographs. Jiel (talk) 08:59, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support Chenspec (talk) 05:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Blown lights. -- -donald- (talk) 06:28, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose mostly per Ikan Kekek. Poor crop (face in center of frame, leaving too much space to the left and top), main subject in shadow against bright background. This can be taken better. --Kreuzschnabel 07:19, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose this picture touches me badly, but unfortunately the technical implementation from the perspective of photography is not good --Hubertl 08:29, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination anyway thank you for all your reviews -- Jiel (talk) 12:16, 12 April 2016 (UTC)