Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Guincho February 2010-2.jpg

File:Guincho February 2010-2.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2010 at 20:33:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Guincho February 2010-2.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Guincho February 2010-2.jpg

•  Info Minimalism (let us count the # of 'nothing special' :-)) ). Everything by Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I like minimalismen and i like many of your pictures, but in my opinion this picture is a little bit boring. Maybe because of the centered horizon or the missing depth. --Simonizer (talk) 23:00, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sky is overexposed, probably a bit later/earlier would have been better (or a ND filter). --Dori - Talk 01:11, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Histogram clearly shows sky is not over exposed - it "feels" tilted to me but I don't think it is. Minimalism works for me on this one. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:13, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

  My software shows highlights as being blown in the red channel. Besides, most software allows you to drag the image to the left of the histogram but it starts replacing blown areas with grey or other weird colors. In any case whether it has technically gone 255 or not, I don't like the light to the left of the image. --Dori - Talk 22:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

  That you don't like it is fine. Technically it is not overexposed as the histogram has not gone off the right hand side, indeed the exposure can be increased by 0.28 before clipping actually shows. The red channel touches the top of the histogram but is not significantly clipped (indeed the green also touches the top). Technical issues but others here may be interested. Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:17, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Simonizer Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 23:23, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - No "wow." Tiptoety ^talk 07:35, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cayambe (talk) 08:05, 6 March 2010 (UTC)