Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Green Grass With Dew.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Green Grass With Dew.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2011 at 08:43:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by danielåhskarlsson - uploaded by danielåhskarlsson - nominated by danielåhskarlsson -- Danielåhskarlsson (talk) 08:43, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Support -- Danielåhskarlsson (talk) 08:43, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Oppose -- Sorry but this is a confusing composition: too many elements attracting our eyes, disturbing unfocused foreground and distracting background. Keep trying and compose carefully the image before shooting! Please take a look at these FP: one, two ... and three. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:20, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Comment Thanks for your opinion. However this is my cind of photography (example the unfocused foreground, it was my purpose), I diden't like the picture you link at all.
They all are boring, but if I hade to choose one I will say the last one. But it is all in the eye of the beholder :) Danielåhskarlsson 10:57, 17 September 2011 (UTC)- Comment Those pictures I pointed to are considered among the best photos Commons has to offer. Of course, you may follow your own way and feel great with it. But your chance of success in this forum will be small if you don't also try to see through the eyes of experienced and talented creators, like the author of those pictures Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:57, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- I like the photo. The ones pointed out are really beautifull but they have a different message. I understand the unfocused foreground, that is the way I also see and photograph things.--Celia Ascenso (talk) 13:08, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 17:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose I really wanted to support this photo as I like the composition a lot, however the DOF is too shallow and the central blade of grass is lost, which is a real shame.
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:47, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
