Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fin Garden Kushak.jpg

File:Fin Garden Kushak.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2019 at 07:26:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Fin Garden Kushak.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fin Garden Kushak.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors
•  Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 07:26, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 07:26, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Domob (talk) 08:58, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment strange artefacts on the water, how is this photo taken? No metadata either. --Ivar (talk) 14:15, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
  • @Iifar: thanks. you're right. I adjusted artifacts problem. this is an HDR panorama picture with 24mm tilt shift lens--Amirpashaei (talk) 16:11, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment the composition is very good and the subject interesting, so it works well as a thumbnail, but there are technical issues at full size. There's chromatic aberration (a bit in the water, a lot in the trees) and some artifacts on the people in the background. The interior quality is good for FP IMO, nice high resolution, but the outside light is really harsh and has lost some detail. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  18:27, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
  • @Rhododendrites: thanks. you're right . I fixed chromatic aberration. and I fixed artifacts on the people too.--Amirpashaei (talk) 19:30, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 18:28, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:10, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Ultimately too soft and the trees outside a little overexposed. It seems like there was a long exposure, which might better explain this, but in the absence of metadata we can't know. Weak support now Daniel Case (talk) 04:22, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per Daniel. I also feel like the colors outside the structure are a little off. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:04, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek: , **@Daniel Case: , thanks for your useful critiques. I improved the light in exterior section. say to me if another improvement needed. I took this picture with 5 frame with tilt shift lens and every frame contain 5 pictures with difference of levels of exposure. (HDR panorama). 6D canon. 24 mm tilt shift lens. iso 100. f:14 exposure time (1/30 , 1/15 , 1/8 , 1/4, 1/2 ). --Amirpashaei (talk) 09:06, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - That looks much better. Do you think it's a true representation of what you saw? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek: thanks Mr kekek. yes. exactly same as what I saw--Amirpashaei (talk) 11:27, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Support - Well then it has my approval. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:21, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Support thanks for the fixes. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  18:44, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - Amirpashaei, I think your category is too general. You should add "#Iran" at the end. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:13, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek: thanks Mr kekek. I added iran to category--Amirpashaei (talk) 19:44, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

• And in your other nominee? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:52, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

• sure. I will add to them too--Amirpashaei (talk) 06:30, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

• When are you planning on doing that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:14, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

• I did it but I think I did it wrong. I will try again tomorrow Mr kekek.--Amirpashaei (talk) 19:31, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
• Weak Support. Personally don't like the yellow rectangle reflection on the lower left corner of picture. --Gnosis (talk) 22:04, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:36, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors