Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Citrus reticulata fruit 2009 G1.jpg

File:Citrus reticulata fruit 2009 G1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2009 at 10:41:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Citrus reticulata fruit 2009 G1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Citrus reticulata fruit 2009 G1.jpg

•  Info All by George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC) -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I do not fancy the wieving angle or background. Maybe just one or two of the fruits against a single-colured backgrond seen from the side? I think that could bring out more detail and keep it simple. --Korall (talk) 10:53, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment viewing angle are normal, it is only angle of wood pattern :) --George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
    •  Comment I kind of didnt like the wood pattern, cause its too much information competing with the fruit for my attention. Sorry friend. --Korall (talk) 16:21, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
      • Ok, don't worry, my friend. Fair opinion is important for me --George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:43, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice. I like it so much. Jacopo Werther (talk) 12:30, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 12:47, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose, as Korall. --Aqwis (talk) 16:00, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Shallow DOF, almost nothing's in focus ; flash lighting causes harsh white reflections on the fruits ; weird light reflecting off the table just behind the plate, distracting from the main subject. Sorry to sound so un-enthusiastic... --MAURILBERT (discuter) 16:53, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad light, odd colours and just average quality. —kallerna™ 17:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think you can replace this image better without flash and adding white (or black) background IMO --Cesco77 (talk) 21:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose light --Leafnode✉ 16:26, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:43, 10 December 2009 (UTC)