Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bloemknop van een Allium (sierui). 16-05-2021. (d.j.b).jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2021 at 05:17:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family : Amaryllidaceae
- Info Flower bud of an Allium (ornamental onion) after a rain shower. Focus stack of 16 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:17, 29 May 2021 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:17, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Question Has the focus-stacking blurred the images in the drops of water? Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:06, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Don't you need a completely different focus (way outside the normal focus stacking interval and possibly a different lens) to get the droplet images sharp too? For most droplet images, it's either focus on the flower or on the droplet image, rarely both. --Cart (talk) 11:46, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- In Helicon Focus you can select, say, image 5 for one droplet and image 9 for another after doing the stack. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:49, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- I think similar things are possible in most stacking programs, but to do it you will still need the image material to do so. When stacking a flower, one might not always chose to have the droplet images sharp too. In this case, I think it would draw the attention from the flower bud and to the droplets instead. Also, to get good in-drop images, you need round drops, these are elongated and will naturally distort any image in them. --Cart (talk) 14:09, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the responses. I don't quite understand all the comments. But that's probably just me. I stacked the photos with "Helicon Focus" and edited them in Adobe Photoshop Lightroom. It went to me on the broken flower bud. I only noticed that the drops would become so large during the development. In a few drops see some of the environment. Do I need to change something about the photo or should I withdraw the photo? PS. My response is a bit late. I was not online before today.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:46, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Famberhorst, you don't need to do anything. :-) Charles and I are simply discussing photo aesthetics. He wants everything perfectly sharp, including what is seen inside the water drops, while I don't think it would contribute to the photo. To me, it is a beautiful photo as it is. Please keep the nomination open and let voter decide. --Cart (talk) 16:46, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for your response. I added the diameter of the flower bud. It was ± 15 mm.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:58, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- As cart says, the photo is fine, I just wonder if you can eliminate the blurring in the water droplets by using selective retouch in Helican Focus? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for your response. I can try but it won't be easy. If I don't like the result, I'll leave it as is.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:17, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Support --Commonists 16:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:09, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice overall but blurry areas at the top/top rightRolfHill (talk) 09:24, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:47, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 16:43, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:35, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:58, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:19, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:46, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulphere 09:37, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family : Amaryllidaceae