Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berg der Seligpreisungen BW 2.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Berg der Seligpreisungen BW 2.JPG, not featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2009 at 13:17:36
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 13:17, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support Mount of beatitudes and Sea of Galilee -- Berthold Werner (talk) 13:17, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I like the silhouette of the railings, and the composition. Just wondering, however, if you have a version without the tree on the left and more of Chinnereth? -- Robert of Ramsor (talk) 21:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Although I like the idea of incorporating the building in the composition, I feel there's too much of the building (especially the right side, with that ugly wall). Can you arrange your nomination to have a better balance? --S23678 (talk) 03:48, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 15:32, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Edit (cropped), not featured
[edit]- Support Mount of beatitudes and Sea of Galilee -- Berthold Werner
- Oppose Main subject of the picture is neither the sea nor the mount but the balcony, and I think it is not a remarkable view of that balcony. --S. Martín (talk) 11:42, 17 April 2009 (UTC).
- Support Looks better after the crop! And its good quality, colors, shadows. Columns also fit well against the background. Locality is also quite special - I had a chance to be there, its truly beautiful place!. --Zakharii 12:06, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I think I spot some chromatic aberration. Check pillar and railings on the left. Please correct me if I am I wrong? Maedin\talk 19:13, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support Only just, though. I was going to vote Neutral. Much better, but still not quite there for my preference.I think you could still have got enough of the shadow of the railings, which is a good feature, while moving forward a little to get more of the lake and less of the tree on the left. Was this the only shot you took at this location? Or were the others the same composition and different exposure rather than alternative composition? -- Robert of Ramsor (talk) 01:46, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
- Info I have three pictures of different exposures, but same composition. --91.9.248.43 07:50, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 15:32, 25 April 2009 (UTC)