Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014-03-27 12-43-57 soda-moisi-19f.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:2014-03-27 12-43-57 soda-moisi-19f.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2014 at 20:09:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 20:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 20:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Comment but what IS it? There's no scale, and no description other than "soda moisi". Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:15, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comment It's some mold on soft drink. --ComputerHotline (talk) 17:03, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- CommentThe image above gave me a clue... Fungi on something (cheese?) Kleuske (talk) 09:02, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- It's in the category 'Focus stacking images of soft drinks mold'. Strange. :-) Diliff (talk) 10:30, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- The categorisation of this image is just stupid. I know Commons category tree is broken but seriously, the primary categorisation of this image should be that it is a mould on a soft drink. So if I go to that category I expect to see it. I don't expect to have to further specify the kind of photographic technique used to capture the image, and especially not when there are no other entries in that category. Focus stacking is as irrelevant to the user as the camera or lens used or the f-stop. Really we should learn to categorise at the sensible depth and not the n-th degree of specialisation. -- Colin (talk) 11:38, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- "The categorisation of this image is just stupid." BE POLITE, PLEASE !!! --ComputerHotline (talk) 17:03, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- I am being polite. There is an adjective before "stupid" that I could have added. -- Colin (talk) 17:48, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- "The categorisation of this image is just stupid." BE POLITE, PLEASE !!! --ComputerHotline (talk) 17:03, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- The categorisation of this image is just stupid. I know Commons category tree is broken but seriously, the primary categorisation of this image should be that it is a mould on a soft drink. So if I go to that category I expect to see it. I don't expect to have to further specify the kind of photographic technique used to capture the image, and especially not when there are no other entries in that category. Focus stacking is as irrelevant to the user as the camera or lens used or the f-stop. Really we should learn to categorise at the sensible depth and not the n-th degree of specialisation. -- Colin (talk) 11:38, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- It's in the category 'Focus stacking images of soft drinks mold'. Strange. :-) Diliff (talk) 10:30, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Oppose I'm not sure how a soft drink goes mouldy but should I care, this picture/description doesn't tell me what the drink is, what the mould is (or are), how big it is, how tall the growth is. But I can plot it on Google Earth :-). Highlights are blown. -- Colin (talk) 18:31, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- "I'm not sure how a soft drink goes mouldy but should I care" : it's some Coca Cola. --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:35, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- How do you get it to go mouldy rather than just evaporate away? It seems a bit contrived, as mouldy soft drinks aren't common in my experience. Anyway, my point is a featured picture, in addition to an outstanding image, needs to make some effort wrt file naming, image description and categorisation -- see the "Image page requirements" of the Commons:Image guidelines. You've told me that it is Coke but haven't updated the image description page. -- Colin (talk) 07:28, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- "I'm not sure how a soft drink goes mouldy but should I care" : it's some Coca Cola. --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:35, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
