Commons:Deletion requests/Image:SNCF 031-130.png

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is a screenshot of a copyrighted computer game or video game, and the copyright for it is most likely held by the company that developed the game. User:Captain Scarlet 19:39, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And if i gererate the image with my SolidWorks, it is copyrighted by SolidWorks Corporation? And if it is shown via my Microsoft Operating System it is copyrighted by Microsoft? And if it is processed via my Eizo digital flat screen, it copyrighted by Eizo? Wrong, this is work, and it is shown with a tool, thats all. -- Stahlkocher 18:21, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're mising the point. If you create an image, say a Jpeg from Photoshoshop, the image is yours. If you take a screenshot in a game, simulator or in a software, then it isn't. Captain Scarlet 17:43, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Now i understand your misunderstanding: The user did create the data for displaying the image. Therefor it is his modell, data and his work. There is no doubt. The graphicengine displaying the work must not been considered. Hope this clears the case. Happy Christmas! -- Stahlkocher 14:44, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just not sure of it... It smells of 3D. Merry Christmas to you too. Captain Scarlet 15:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
We send 3D models round the world every day. Work is not limited to 2D. The engine did now raise own rights. Data may be transformed. Happy new year to you and your family. -- Stahlkocher 15:19, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Fixed an old request. Notes above from Image talk page. I cannot see that this discussion has been put through the usual deletion process, and as the subpage was not created, I am assuming it wasn't. Please feel free to speedy close if this is old. Thank you.

Same arguments also for:

Deadstar 15:09, 2 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

  • Keep if the uploader asserts he modelled it himself, we should allow the image unless we have proof it came from a copyrighted program. -Nard 22:27, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Uploader seems to have fairly good notions of the copyright problem, and I see no reason to doubt his word. And if we accept that the uploader is the author of the model, no problem remains. Rama 21:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 06:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]