Commons:Deletion requests/Image:PokemonMini.JPG

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

potential copyvio, a derivative work --Cat out 23:17, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep "…simply because photographs are in this colloquial sense 'derived' from their subject matter, it does not necessarily follow that they are derivative works under copyright law. . . .[U]tilitarian object[s (such as the Skyy vodka bottle) are] not protected by copyright." (Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits, Inc., 225 F.3d 1068 (9th Cir. 2000)) LX (talk, contribs) 04:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. There is no violation. Thats a photo of a product similar to thousands of photos. --TM 14:27, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep - I don't see a copyvio here. --32X 22:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the {{Delete}} because 16 days are enough and nothing happened. --32X 00:25, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. I know I have initiated and closed the debate but since no one complained I think it is safe to close it after 16 days. --Cat out 00:55, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted Pokemon image and logo -Nard 23:39, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should we also delete images in Category:Nintendo DS because the Nintendo DS logo is copyrighted and trademarked? --Damian Yerrick () 23:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Who knows? Maybe we should delete screenshots of Windows apps just because they incidentally include a box which was drawn with an API call. -Nard 23:50, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. We need precedents for what Commons considers a copyvio and what is merely de minimis copying. I know some people are going through other people's images to find opportunities to set such precedents. Does the previous keeping of this image form part of a precedent? --Damian Yerrick () 14:46, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

speedy keep Clearly a shot of a thing that happens to have a company logo on it. --Simonxag 18:27, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative of copyrighted Pokemon image – Oh noez, 32x42 pixels of the 800x500 pixels resemble a yellowish something. It should be possible to blank out the label of the game cartridge if necessary. Besides that, the logos aren't the main part of the photo, they are only decoration. From my point of view there's no need to delete the photo, so keep it. --32X 00:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. The inclusion of the copyrighted element is incidental and takes up 0.3% of the image as a whole. LX (talk, contribs) 20:02, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]