Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Paris Hilton - That's Hot.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The only thing the flickr user does is collecting images from women in public and promotional and other shots of actresses (Monica Belluci, Audrey Hepburn, Grace Kelly, ...), putting them under "free" licenses. This image is copied from some paparazzi website. Looking for "paris that's hot" on google, you can find similar photos (same bag, same skirt, same shirt) and this one on other websites. Polarlys 18:00, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Appears to be a copyvio of http://laist.com/attachments/la_zach/paris-hilton_thatshot.jpg as displayed by LAist: "That's Hot." Now Come and Sue Us at http://laist.com/2007/09/08/thats_hot_now_c.php. This Flickr user appears to be a license fraud at http://www.flickr.com/photos/32515288@N00/ AKA Quibbling Bunnies. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 19:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Unless you can prove, a image is not copyrighted just because it appear on google or other website. The image is on flickr licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.0, that's enough. -- JohnBiancato talk 23:57, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Since people create flickr accounts to upload copyrighted photos from there to Wikimedia Commons and since there are thousands of flickr user whose portfolio just consists of collected copyvios under free licenses: It's not enough. We don't have to prove anything, a lot of professional photos from actresses on the user's flickr page is enough evidence not t trust him. ––Polarlys 11:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. See also my deletion requests starting at Commons:Deletion_requests/2007/09/30#Image:Victoria_Beckham.jpg. --BLueFiSH 18:56, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete inconsistent EXIF information on the rest of that users flickr photos suggest that it wasn't taken by the user. Megapixie