Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Neohelix albolabris drawing shell.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
better quality images exist at Image:Neohelix albolabris shell.jpg and Image:Neohelix albolabris shell 2.jpg --Snek01 (talk) 22:15, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Keep Not a reason to delete. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 00:19, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- If you still think so, then read the message below. --Snek01 (talk) 21:03, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Different images, it may be helpful to have an image of the shells together as well as separate. Camaron · Christopher · talk 16:21, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- This image is worse in quality although it is from from the same source. It will NEVER be used until somebody will upload it in better quality. I know it, because I upload images only like this and I have uploaded this one also and those ones also. Keep it FOREVER if you love it so much, but there is no need to keep everything. Additionally such images can be easily placed above or next to itself. It is useful to delete it, so nobody will use accidentally use this image of such horrible quality. This is not propose to delete, this is normal demand to delete it for practical purposes. There are few tens possibilities how to manage two or three objects. I usually upload only one file and I accidentaly uploaded two. If you want to keep things that somebody uploaded accidentaly, then keep everything. Then a user will need to became a detective to decide which is the best image for his puproposes, because there will be MANY similar images. --Snek01 (talk) 21:03, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- The quality does not seem that bad to me, it is certainly good enough to be usable. Yes things can be deleted if they are uploaded accidentally and are not useful, such as images identical to another image, but this is not the case here. I don't see any practical reason why it needs to be deleted, it is within scope and no recognisable copyright issues. I would be more sympathetic towards uploader requested deletion if it was the uploaders work, but that is not the case here, it is public domain material from a book. This is deletion request like any other, and my keep vote stands. Camaron · Christopher · talk 11:07, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- This image is worse in quality although it is from from the same source. It will NEVER be used until somebody will upload it in better quality. I know it, because I upload images only like this and I have uploaded this one also and those ones also. Keep it FOREVER if you love it so much, but there is no need to keep everything. Additionally such images can be easily placed above or next to itself. It is useful to delete it, so nobody will use accidentally use this image of such horrible quality. This is not propose to delete, this is normal demand to delete it for practical purposes. There are few tens possibilities how to manage two or three objects. I usually upload only one file and I accidentaly uploaded two. If you want to keep things that somebody uploaded accidentaly, then keep everything. Then a user will need to became a detective to decide which is the best image for his puproposes, because there will be MANY similar images. --Snek01 (talk) 21:03, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Simple explanation for simple users: accidentally uploaded image with low resolution. --Snek01 (talk) 21:13, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Not a duplicate, no compelling reason to delete it (no strong support for deletion either). –Tryphon☂ 14:45, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
