Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Hayden Christensen 05-2005.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
copyright violation from: http://flickr.com/photos/marcokraus/page11/
—the preceding unsigned comment was added by Secar one (talk • contribs)
- sorrie about that, i don`t have that much experience with these kind of work, secar one 12:09, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- I don't understant what's the problem with this photo. I uploaded this photo from the deutch wikipedia where the photo was originally uploaded by the the user MarcoKraus : it's the same pseudonym that on the flicker's page so it is likely they are the same person. Sayan 10:09, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Checking the de user page, it certainly seems to be the same person, and he's uploaded other images from the same event that he also has on flickr. You could suggest to him that he add a note to his flickr pages about the GFDL licensing. --Davepape 14:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Judging from the user's contributions on de.wiki, we can't expect a fast clering on this subject. Also, judging from this edit on his talk page, he has been informed about the meaning of releasing images under free licenses such as the GFDL. Since the picture is still copyrighted on Flickr and there was no Flickr review when it was uploaded on Commons, I think we can't assume that the user wants it under a free license. So I'm inclined to
Delete. - Secar one, when you nominate a page for deletion, please don't remove the page content or leave comments of this type (or at least use the discussion page). In a collaborative, voluntary project, we all do our best and many times it's not enough, unfortunately. Regards, PatríciaR msg 15:28, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- Judging from the user's contributions on de.wiki, we can't expect a fast clering on this subject. Also, judging from this edit on his talk page, he has been informed about the meaning of releasing images under free licenses such as the GFDL. Since the picture is still copyrighted on Flickr and there was no Flickr review when it was uploaded on Commons, I think we can't assume that the user wants it under a free license. So I'm inclined to
- Checking the de user page, it certainly seems to be the same person, and he's uploaded other images from the same event that he also has on flickr. You could suggest to him that he add a note to his flickr pages about the GFDL licensing. --Davepape 14:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Kept Image was originally uploaded by the same user name as the flickr one. All uploads on de.wiki by this user was from the flickr site and licensed as GFDL on wikipedia, but All rights reserved on flickr. I've checked the user page links on de.wiki, flickr and his homepage, I've found no indication that the files was made by another person or that it is a copyvio. It seems to be his work and he released the image on wikipedia under GFDL. --GeorgHH • talk 20:57, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
