Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Grey Cup circa 2006.jpg
Same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Cricket World Cup trophy.png; in violation of Commons:Derivative works.--Thugchildz 07:57, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete per nom.--Thugchildz 23:05, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep In Canada, where the photograph was taken, "it is not an infringement of copyright for any person to reproduce, in a painting, drawing, engraving, photograph or cinematographic work a sculpture or work of artistic craftsmanship or a cast or model of a sculpture or work of artistic craftsmanship, that is permanently situated in a public place or building". [1] -Aude (talk | contribs) 14:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- I doubt it is permanently situated there. See [2]. I have no knowledge of Candian law, but the meaning of 'public place' probably isn't met by the premises of a bank. William Avery 19:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
It is neither permanently situated there nor is the museum a public place.--Thugchildz 07:30, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep drinking vessel → industrial machine made utility article → not copyrighted --LimoWreck 22:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
I do not think that counts as a drinking vessel, from dictionary.com- drinking vessel noun a vessel intended for drinking and this isn't intended for drinking and per Commons:Derivative works- Photographs of three-dimensional objects are always copyrighted. Even if the object itself is in the public domain. If you didn't take the photograph yourself, you need permission from the owner of the photographic copyright (unless of course the photograph itself is in the public domain). And the photograph can not be public domain because By taking a picture, you create a new, copyrighted work (i.e. the photograph). At the same time, the rights of the original still exists and don't go away. By publishing the picture, you do something only the original copyright holder is allowed to do. That's why you won't be able to use your own photography of a copyrighted work (except as fair use) unless the creator of the original gave you permission to do so. It must be deleted.--Thugchildz 03:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep I'm no expert in copyright law, but the 98 year old Grey Cup is de facto public domain in Canada and this picture of it is under the CC-BY 2.0 license on flickr. All I did is crop and rotate it slightly - if the summary/copyright info should be tweaked to better reflect this, I could use some help with that. Thanks, heqs 07:27, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Withdraw nomination- This is a drinking vessel, since it was created with the possibility to be able to drink from it, it was intended somewhat for drinking.--THUGCHILDz 02:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Kept, per Heqs, and also because it appears to be just a standard cup. / Fred Chess 22:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
