Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Formule 1 2008.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This is an EXPERIMENT, not ready to be used world-wide, and has been deleted for the same reason before. Erik Baas (talk) 14:54, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - for experiments nl.Wikipedia is equiped with a sandpit. This image shows up in article space, so it's not experimental or it should not be in an article. GijsvdL (talk) 15:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - There is no sandpit for experimenting with images. Besides: this image was moved to commons in spite of an explicit request not to do so. I made it, I think it is not ready to be used on other WP's, so I think I have the right to request for it to be deleted. - Erik Baas (talk) 15:41, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- The image actually is in use at at least one other language version. GijsvdL (talk) 15:45, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - There is no sandpit for experimenting with images. Besides: this image was moved to commons in spite of an explicit request not to do so. I made it, I think it is not ready to be used on other WP's, so I think I have the right to request for it to be deleted. - Erik Baas (talk) 15:41, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Speedy Keep Used in another projects mainspace. So "user request" is not a valid reason. @Baas: Maybe someone else wants to work on it. It's GFDL, everyone has the right to upload here (and again even if it gets deleted). Rocket000 (talk) 15:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete It is used in another project because GijsvdL (above) has included it there despite the fact that the image is proposed for deletion here. Mwpnl (talk) 16:00, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- I was mistaken about this image being deleted before: it happened to Image:A1 2008.svg, which was uploaded by GijsvdL. Coincidence ? Nah... - Erik Baas (talk) 16:09, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- I just found out that the wrong version was copied from nl: to commons, and that there is no name in the "author" field. Two more reasons to delete it. - Erik Baas (talk) 18:03, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - I think that just the fact that GijsvdL quickly used it on another wiki should be enough reason for deletion, is he trying to make a point or something? Thoth (talk) 09:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- This is really a stupid reason for deletion. GijsvdL (talk) 11:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- So is keeping it because you quickly used it elsewhere after uploading it to commons against the wishes from the creator. Why do we have local upload on Wikipedia anyway? Is it to keep guys like you busy? Thoth (talk) 13:15, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- That's a logical fallacy. You wrongly assume that only useful things exist. GijsvdL (talk) 13:44, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- So is keeping it because you quickly used it elsewhere after uploading it to commons against the wishes from the creator. Why do we have local upload on Wikipedia anyway? Is it to keep guys like you busy? Thoth (talk) 13:15, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- This is really a stupid reason for deletion. GijsvdL (talk) 11:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - I think that just the fact that GijsvdL quickly used it on another wiki should be enough reason for deletion, is he trying to make a point or something? Thoth (talk) 09:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Update: the image is not used in any project anymore. - Erik Baas (talk) 19:57, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Deleted, not used anywhere, at the Dutch wikipedia, it was explicitly stated not to move the image. Kameraad Pjotr 16:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC)