Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Coca-Cola Vanilla Zero US label.jpg
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
derivative work and verry bad quality for me __ ABF __ ϑ 20:21, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Keep It's clearly marked as with trademark and getting in that close was the only way I could get in enough details. No one objected to the GFDL tagging all the time it was on enwiki. If it's derivative then we ought to delete the entire coke bottle category, many of the images in which have the Coke logo shown at about the same size. It's slightly shaken, but the words are still legible, therefore it's sufficiently encylopedic. Daniel Case 20:27, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Please note also that the Coke logo itself, the central aspect of that bottle label, is in the public domain in the US. Daniel Case 20:35, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- And is this photo any different, really? Daniel Case 20:35, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Keep Not a copyvio. It is laughable to think that such an object is a copyrightable "work of art". -Nard 21:03, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete All over the world, courts protect commercial artwork. They don't apply value judgements just copyright law. Do you really think Transformers toys are art? --Simonxag 22:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Nevertheless, the copyrighted elements of this image are minimal ... the words "Vanilla" and "Zero", assuming Coke actually went and got them copyrighted as well as trademarked, and that's about it. The bottle itself, not that much is shown, can't be copyrighted as it is a "useful article." It's hardly a value judgement, just a legal one. Daniel Case 06:19, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- The only thing copyrightable on there is the background design -- not the logo, not the text. I'm not sure if that is enough to delete on, but maybe. Carl Lindberg 21:49, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Copyright commercial artwork (the Coca Cola logo itself is old enough to be out of copyright, but the rest is not). MichaelMaggs 17:09, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
