Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Buttocks.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphan; Commons is not for non-encyclopedic content.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:16, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep come on.. non enyclopedic yet neither is the gallery of penises, fellatio, pornography and ejaculation vids available here. Besides this is probably more encyclopedic than the ones I mentioned. Madmax32 00:51, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I can't think of how it could be used to illustrate an encyclopedia article. It isn't a particularly good illustration of its putative subject due to the lighting, angle and highlights. Walter Siegmund (talk) 01:21, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Right. There are probably better images of nude female buttocks, labia, vaginal openings, and sunbathing. Also, Pogrebnoj-Alexandroff appears to be trying to host its entire art collection here on Commons.  :)   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 02:21, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see a problem with his artwork as long as he is not stealing it from somewhere. Madmax32 05:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What about the watermarks? Those are against policy, and he flat-out refuses to remove them.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 16:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted; obvious copyvio. Walter Siegmund (talk) 03:44, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image:Buttocks.jpg (2nd request)

[edit]

User uploaded using filename he previously used that was deleted as a copyvio; {{CopyrightedFreeUseProvidedThat|Pogrebnoj-Alexandroff}} produces invalid nonsense.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 21:49, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So, if the uploader made a small mistake specifying the copyright then why don't you contact him to have him correct himself? This is a beautiful picture and I vote for keep: Roman Czyborra 22:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A Russian contributor would have used a Russian filename - obviously snagged from elsewhere. --Connel MacKenzie 15:40, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not convinced by your argument. Other Russian contributors use English file names, e.g., EugeneZelenko (talk · contribs). Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per consensus and Commons:Deletion_requests/Uploads_of_Pogrebnoj-Alexandroff. Walter Siegmund (talk) 19:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]