Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Arlington Stadium WS.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The World Stadiums site (http://www.worldstadiums.com/) claims to host free photos of football (soccer) stadiums around the world.[1] However, investigations will show that it is a indiscriminate host of copyright violations. They have taken André Zahn's CC by 2.0 Image:Old Trafford inside 20060726 1.jpg here on Commons, and used it.[2] Slapping their watermark on it, they did not bother to mention anywhere that Zahn was the original author. Furthermore, they should have released their modified image under a similar CC license but nowhere do their policies or actions come to that effect. This goes against the CC by 2.0 license Zahn has made the image available for use. Further examples of blatant copyright violation:

A list of images on Commons from the site that should also be deleted:

As on 03:25, 29 November 2008 (UTC). World Stadiums cannot be trusted on the copyright status for any of their hosted image. The issue has been brought up on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Attention#World Stadiums is a bad source as well. Jappalang (talk) 03:24, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I took the bold step to mark the images (except Arlington's) as No permissions. Jappalang (talk) 01:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that taggin is no problem, but it is also not needed: Worldstadium is not a reliable source like shown in your statement, simply use TinEye and you will come to the same result for nearly every image from this website: resized, +logo, owned. Thats blatant violation of copyright i think,  Delete all images. --Martin H. (talk) 05:59, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Clearly not a trustable source. Even if a few of those images are really free, we don't know the real authors of them (since World Statiums just ripped them) and thus can't attribute them in a correct way as would be required by licence. Cecil (talk) 13:30, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]