Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Šenjug-kata-Tampere-2006.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
I see no indication this photo is reserved under cc-by-sa, though I could be missing something. I can't read Dutch, but it looks like at the bottom it says all rights reserved. --Patstuart 22:18, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- This page has Attribution-ShareAlike in Detailid under the word avalik. By the way, I think it's Estonian — but I'm not sure. Thierry Caro 22:24, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- While one might infer from the words "Attribution-ShareAlike" that the author has probably intended to publish the work under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike license, I'm afraid it's not clear and explicit enough to be considered an actual licensing statement. (And yes, that's Estonian.) Please do not attempt to close the deletion discussion until consensus has been reached. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - it seems fairly obvious that the author mean cc-by-sa. However else in the world would attribution-sharealike ever appear together like that? Patstuart 23:11, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Thierry Caro 23:18, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- Assumptions like that are reasonable but dangerous. Should the author change their mind and take action against Commons, we don't have a legal leg to stand on. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I think that the site modeled its licenses after the CC licenses, but that they are not the same. Nevertheless, it looks like the license should be acceptable on commons. If it is, then we have a new source of free images ;) We'll never know without someone who speaks Eesti, though. I have therefore asked someone who does speak it. --rimshottalk 14:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- P.S: In Estonian the names of languages are written in small caps and there is usually added the word "keel" (language) in appropriate case [1]. So it would be: someone who speaks eesti keelt (Estonian).
- Suur aitäh! This is really quite odd. There is no official Creative Commons translation in Estonian, so I'm guessing this is an attempt to create that (but only for the summary). So the question remains if we can really claim that this is {{CC-by-sa}}, or if it's just something similar. If it's a case of the latter, are the terms clear enough to use as a licence, and how do we tag the image? This could have been avoided if the website had indicated clearly what the precise legal terms were. Unfortunately, I'm not sure it's a change they could make retroactively without asking all contributors. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- We could tag it as {{Copyrighted free use provided that}}. I don't really like saying some was released under a certain license without explicit consent of the copyright holder, even if the terms are identical. Either way, I would say this image is allowed here. →Rocket°°° 23:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Suur aitäh! This is really quite odd. There is no official Creative Commons translation in Estonian, so I'm guessing this is an attempt to create that (but only for the summary). So the question remains if we can really claim that this is {{CC-by-sa}}, or if it's just something similar. If it's a case of the latter, are the terms clear enough to use as a licence, and how do we tag the image? This could have been avoided if the website had indicated clearly what the precise legal terms were. Unfortunately, I'm not sure it's a change they could make retroactively without asking all contributors. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Kept. And changing to {{Copyrighted free use provided that}}. Patrícia msg 14:42, 14 February 2008 (UTC)