Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Šenjug-kata-Tampere-2006.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I see no indication this photo is reserved under cc-by-sa, though I could be missing something. I can't read Dutch, but it looks like at the bottom it says all rights reserved. --Patstuart 22:18, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page has Attribution-ShareAlike in Detailid under the word avalik. By the way, I think it's Estonian — but I'm not sure. Thierry Caro 22:24, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
While one might infer from the words "Attribution-ShareAlike" that the author has probably intended to publish the work under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike license, I'm afraid it's not clear and explicit enough to be considered an actual licensing statement. (And yes, that's Estonian.) Please do not attempt to close the deletion discussion until consensus has been reached. LX (talk, contribs) 22:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - it seems fairly obvious that the author mean cc-by-sa. However else in the world would attribution-sharealike ever appear together like that? Patstuart 23:11, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thierry Caro 23:18, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Assumptions like that are reasonable but dangerous. Should the author change their mind and take action against Commons, we don't have a legal leg to stand on. LX (talk, contribs) 17:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I think that the site modeled its licenses after the CC licenses, but that they are not the same. Nevertheless, it looks like the license should be acceptable on commons. If it is, then we have a new source of free images ;) We'll never know without someone who speaks Eesti, though. I have therefore asked someone who does speak it. --rimshottalk 14:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Translations are presented below (with some minor misspelling mistakes)
Attribution. Sa lubad teistel kopeerida, levitada, näidata ja kasutada oma autoriõigustega kaitstud tööd - ja töid mis baseeruvad sinu tööl - aga seda ainult juhul, kui sulle ja sinu tööle on viidatud selliselt viisil nagu sina seda nõuad (autori nime äratoomisega).
Attribution. You allow others to copy, distribute, show and use your work that has protected by the copyright laws and the works that are based on your work but only in the case if there has been referenced to you and to your work in the way you want it to be (with mentioning the authors name).
Share Alike. Sa lubad luua teistel töid mis baseeruvad sinu tööl tingimusel, et tulemuse levitamise tingimused ja kaasnevad autoriõigused on täpselt samasugused kui sinu tööl.
Share Alike. You allow others to create works that are based on your work in the condition if the result will be distributed under the conditions and the copyrights indicating to that will be exactly the same as they were for your work.
P.S: In Estonian the names of languages are written in small caps and there is usually added the word "keel" (language) in appropriate case [1]. So it would be: someone who speaks eesti keelt (Estonian).
Iffcool 20:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Suur aitäh! This is really quite odd. There is no official Creative Commons translation in Estonian, so I'm guessing this is an attempt to create that (but only for the summary). So the question remains if we can really claim that this is {{CC-by-sa}}, or if it's just something similar. If it's a case of the latter, are the terms clear enough to use as a licence, and how do we tag the image? This could have been avoided if the website had indicated clearly what the precise legal terms were. Unfortunately, I'm not sure it's a change they could make retroactively without asking all contributors. LX (talk, contribs) 21:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We could tag it as {{Copyrighted free use provided that}}. I don't really like saying some was released under a certain license without explicit consent of the copyright holder, even if the terms are identical. Either way, I would say this image is allowed here. →Rocket°°° 23:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good to me. LX (talk, contribs) 12:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. And changing to {{Copyrighted free use provided that}}. Patrícia msg 14:42, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]