Commons:Deletion requests/File:Zgodovina pustega gradu.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyrighted information board, no FOP in Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 07:58, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Delete And delete File:Zgodovina Lipniškega gradu.JPG as well. Both are copyvios: based on the printing technology used, the creator of the information boards didn't die before 1945, therefore no freedom of panorama. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:23, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
- Both tables were erected in 2004.[1] --Eleassar (t/p) 22:33, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
- Come on, it is just an information board, created by humble people who weren't even put their names on it. Let it be there.--Irena Plahuta (talk) 00:02, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- Which makes absolutely no difference to the copyright status of the image. Under the Berne Convention, the copyright in the text is granted to the authors automatically. This is a clear derivative work. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:00, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- If the people are humble and this is "just an information board" (well, granted, it isn't Sydney Opera), this does not mean yet that some professor (or anyone else) can stripe them of their rights, take their work, present it as his own and give everyone the license to use it at will for any purpose, as long as he is credited as the author. It's like stealing someone's property to make benefits for oneself. --Eleassar (t/p) 16:23, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
KeepTaking a photo of textual information on a public place means that a photographer claims he is the author of the text? What a pervert interpretation! To be consistent, you should delete thousands of information boards in this category, which would be insane. --Hladnikm (talk) 08:41, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- That's irrelevant. The authorship claim of the photograph doesn't matter. The lack of freedom-of-panorama in Slovenia is what makes it a copyright violation. Insane or not, that's the law. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:46, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- If the people are humble and this is "just an information board" (well, granted, it isn't Sydney Opera), this does not mean yet that some professor (or anyone else) can stripe them of their rights, take their work, present it as his own and give everyone the license to use it at will for any purpose, as long as he is credited as the author. It's like stealing someone's property to make benefits for oneself. --Eleassar (t/p) 16:23, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Keep We can asume the author is anonymous (therefore PD-Europe), as no explicit copyright notice (required by law) is visible. --Miha (talk) 21:56, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- We can't (see the link above). The copyright notice is not required by law. --Eleassar (t/p) 21:58, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
