Commons:Deletion requests/File:WikiProject Scouting trefoil inverse.svg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WikiProject Scouting trefoil inverse.svg

[edit]

crude test image I created but never intended to be put up at Commons --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 06:26, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. No valid reason for deletion given. --Jergen (talk) 09:06, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, file is in use. Kameraad Pjotr 19:36, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WikiProject_Scouting_trefoil_inverse.svg

[edit]
test image requested by me, replaced by higher quality svg, of no remaining value or use, but thanks to the creator Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:56, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per Kameraad Pjotr (see previous deletion request).--ARTEST4ECHO talk 21:29, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That was based on it being in use. Where is it in use?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:22, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
User:Kameraad Pjotr close the DR as "KEEP", reopening it as you did is inappropriate. So, I still say "Keep" Per User:Kameraad Pjotr. After all on 11 March 2011, the time of the "Keep", it may have been in use. You may have removed the image from where ever it was being use on March 12th for all we know. Additionally not being used is not having a reason for deletion. Just because an image isn't used isn't a reason for it to be deleted. --ARTEST4ECHO talk 13:34, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"may have been"? So that means you really didn't check, as I did, did you? So that further means this throwaway vote of your is completely without meaning. And hey, thanks for the good faith, jerk.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:44, 17 March 2011 (UTC)--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:44, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I did check it. It "may have been" in use the day the DR was closed. Nothing you have said or shown has disproven that. You are correct that right at this moment it is not in use, and I have never said that this isn't true. However, you and I both know there is no way for you to know when an image went from being used to not being used. Kameraad Pjotr closed the DR as "KEEP" on 10 February 2010. You reopened a "Closed" DR, 22 days later, and are now claiming that the close wasn’t correct because the image wasn't actually being used, and acted as if Kameraad Pjotr closed it as “keep in use” when it was never “in use” in the first place.
Yes, it may not be now, so if you still want the image deleted, open a new DR independent of this one and make your claim.
I still say “keep” per Kameraad Pjotr since this DR was properly closed by Kameraad Pjotr in February, and there is no way to show that Kameraad Pjotr preformed an improper close.
However, that being said, again, just because an image isn't used, isn't a valid reason for it to be deleted. It won’t be deleted anyway, so why bother.
Additionally this isn’t a vote. I find it funny when users disagree with you, that they assume that you didn't check, read what was said, and that somehow means that they should be ignored. This is a consensus, meaning that the stronger argument is the one followed. I don’t need to check with you to make my argument, so even if I didn’t “Check” which I did, my argument is still valid. You can have 50 people vote "keep", but if the 10 who say “delete” have the stronger argument for "delete" then it’s deleted.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 14:00, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You're the one spewing accusations, jerk. 22 days? The last deletion discussion was a year ago. Can't you count? What are you on?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 23:13, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. - it has been in use, so it's not out of scope - Jcb (talk) 13:46, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:WikiProject_Scouting_trefoil_inverse.svg&oldid=418532383"