Commons:Deletion requests/File:Werkfoto Deutz KHD A8M324 Lauscher Wehrmachtdieselloks.png

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file may meet the criteria for speedy deletion. This file is a copyright violation because it is copyrighted and not published under a free license. The file is subject to speedy deletion unless it is relicensed according to the Commons licensing policy. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: It is not known when it was published. Licence is invalid. No evidence that the author died 70 years ago. Photo scanned from book published in 2008. Please refer to Commons:Publication. There is no evidence that it was published 70 years ago. In this book is clause - All rights reserved. Licence is invalid. As long as there's no evidence that the photograph was published before 1953, we're talking about a fake license and illegal copying of photos from the book. This is not factory photography. All content in the book is copyrighted by the publisher. Respecting the law is not about advancing treatment without treatment. is a photo from an external collection. It never means that someone can scan a photo from a book and a recipe that they introduce shortly after creating it. It can be assumed that the photo is from many years later. There are many indications that this is a photograph taken by a private person. There are no signs that this is a promotional photo. He can never immediately receive an assessment that a given photo is given immediately after it has been taken. It shouldn't be discretionary. This can never be an arbitrary decision by one editor. This file is a copyright violation because it comes from: Stefan Lauscher: "Die Diesellokomotiven der Wehrmacht. Die Geschichte der Baureihen V 20, V 36 und V 188", EK-Verlag, Freiburg 2006, ISBN 3-88255-236-0 Uoijm77 (talk) 13:12, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Das ist ein Werkfoto von KHD aus dem Jahr 1938, ist also gemeinfrei. Warum kommt ihr erst jetzt mit der Frage nach der Lizenz? Die Lokomotive wurde schon 2019 bearbeitet. Rainerhaufe (talk) 09:16, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The date the photo was taken in this case is irrelevant. The date of publication is more important. The above photo is not in the public domain. It can be seen that uploader disregard any rules related to copyright.The fact that no one has reported the photo so far does not mean that it is legally uploaded. Uoijm77 (talk) 09:57, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Das Foto wurde 1938 aufgenommen und der Veröffentlicher aus den 1970er jahren hat ein Foto verwendet, das heute gemeinfrei ist.Rainerhaufe (talk) 10:09, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete An incomprehensible argument. Conjuring reality is pointless. The age of the photo in this case does not matter. The only complaint is the lack of evidence that the photo was published more than 70 years ago. It is possible that the picture comes from a private collection. The only documented case of the publication of this photo is the aforementioned book. Picture is not public domain. Uoijm77 (talk) 12:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
wir sollen nicht mehrmals  Keep bzw.  Delete hintereinander verwenden. Es handelt sich um ein Werkfoto von 1938, der Fotograf ist nicht bekannt. Also wurde es auch nach 1938 auf jedem Fall veröffentlicht, damals waren solche Loks Neuland. Rainerhaufe (talk) 12:29, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Embarrassing argument. There is no clear evidence that the photo is in the public domain. Uoijm77 (talk) 11:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep ein Foto was vor 1945 im Rahmen einer Werkfotografie entstanden ist, als das Fotografieren von Eisenbahnanlagen privat verboten war, von einem unbekannten Fotografen, ist keine Urheberrechtsverletzung. Es ist daher gemeinfrei.Rainerhaufe (talk) 08:46, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence to indicate that the photo was published earlier than in the book. Conjuring reality is pointless. Uoijm77 (talk) 10:37, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Evidence missing that this photograph was published early enough. Given publication date is 2006. --Wdwd (talk) 12:27, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]