Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wendingen Series 11 No. 02.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Çünkü o Bulanık Mrs.Akchays (talk) 09:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This file seems to be a (just tiny) cropped version of the original (see top right). The slightly larger version of this image was uploaded to Commons in 2016. Both images are from the same source. Vysotsky (talk) 10:49, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: in use--Achim (talk) 18:59, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: This file is as sharp as the source and is part of a series of files with the same size from the same source. Waterborough (talk) 13:43, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Category:Wendingen in chronological order is superfluous, as Category:Wendingen is more complete and offers a better choice with a variety of colour, resolution and format (and sometimes also images of the backside of the journal). The image in question was added to Commons 4 years after a nearly identical image. The older image has the brightness and colours of the original. Aside: I'm pretty sure that within considerable time both imges will be superfluous, as a Dutch museum will certainly make all images available in highres. Vysotsky (talk) 18:35, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: The category is by no means superfluous. It shows each picture only one time and not in countless variations. In addition, the small resolution is much cheaper to build the page in wikipedia. For images with a high resolution, it takes an unnecessarily long time to set up the page. It is also more pleasant when viewing the images behind each other that all the images have the same resolution. That is also the reason why I uploaded all these pictures. Waterborough (talk) 20:17, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think here is the end of the discussion and most say keep. Waterborough (talk) 23:08, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, Thuresson (talk) 00:38, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]