Commons:Deletion requests/File:Voluptuous model on a boat. (6772371695).jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Voluptuous model on a boat. (6772371695).jpg

Redundant: the guy uploaded multiple pictures of this girl to Commons for no apparent reason. Csapdani (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

 Keep Images clearly in scope and not redundant as can be seen by this gallery of the images nominated by Csapdani to deletion:

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Per the arguments of Tuvalkin and Pere prlpz in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aphrodisiacal smile. (6772380395).jpg

Also this images are in scope of professional modeling of beachwear, the Philips multinational (see the files description), and the categories associated with each image

Personal statement about the deletion request: You Csapdani are a riddle. Registered in April 2 2015, you waited exactly 2 months until you made your firsts (and only) edits, nominating 16 images in a row to deletion. So you, a newbie, show a high proficiency in wiki editions and inner workings. So, in reality, who are you? Tm (talk) 16:35, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Keep, per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aphrodisiacal smile. (6772380395).jpg. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:02, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

---

Kept: INeverCry 00:30, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Voluptuous model on a boat. (6772371695).jpg

Scope, not used Triplecaña (talk) 09:20, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Keep: Did you seen the previous DR resolved as kept? Unused but properly categorised. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:35, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Keep Per previous DR that showed clearly the scope of this files, beyond any doubt, as the scope of this image the professional modeling of beachwear, the Philips multinational (see the files description), and more categories associated with the image. Tm (talk) 02:16, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Keep, of course, per the above, and the several clueless DRs that have been plagueing this series. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 10:52, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment: Whoever is bothered enough by the creepy filenames, then show some work and request renamings, not deletions. (I am bothered, but not enough.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 10:52, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

---

Kept: as above. --Yasu (talk) 15:52, 14 April 2016 (UTC)