Commons:Deletion requests/File:Volksrecht NZZ 17 Juni 1934.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No author given. No reason to believe he is already more than 70 years dead. → PD-old template not correct. Saibo (Δ) 18:50, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- If Swiss author unknown, the rule of 70 years after publication applies. --Fernrohr (talk) 21:38, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yep, but research has to be done (and documented on the image description page) to ensure it really is an anon work. And, of course, someone needs to change the license template. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 00:28, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Permission template changed to "anonymous work". The newspaper article is not signed, therefore anonymous. Request can be closed. --Fernrohr (talk) 13:16, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- It is signed if I see correctly "ag" at the beginning. Could be the author's initials. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 23:07, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- According to the newspaper itself (I asked), the author is UNKNOWN. --Fernrohr (talk) 15:59, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. Unknown is not anonymous (or is in Swiss only "unknown" enough for the 70 years rule?). However, if the "ag" should not be name initials it is okay with the changed license template. --Saibo (Δ) 03:56, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yes it is. --Fernrohr (talk) 16:05, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. Unknown is not anonymous (or is in Swiss only "unknown" enough for the 70 years rule?). However, if the "ag" should not be name initials it is okay with the changed license template. --Saibo (Δ) 03:56, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- According to the newspaper itself (I asked), the author is UNKNOWN. --Fernrohr (talk) 15:59, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- It is signed if I see correctly "ag" at the beginning. Could be the author's initials. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 23:07, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- Permission template changed to "anonymous work". The newspaper article is not signed, therefore anonymous. Request can be closed. --Fernrohr (talk) 13:16, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yep, but research has to be done (and documented on the image description page) to ensure it really is an anon work. And, of course, someone needs to change the license template. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 00:28, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Keep, now. --Saibo (Δ) 16:58, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:19, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
