Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vimy Ridge Memorial WWI impoverished figures close up.JPG

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vimy Ridge Memorial WWI impoverished figures close up.JPG

[edit]

No FOP in France - There is no extraterritoriality in these cemeteries. French law applies in full force Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 14:23, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete For the same reason as explained here [[1]] by BrightRaven.
Responded over there. Skeezix1000 (talk) 22:37, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Je ne vois pas pourquoi les règles appliquées à l'ossuaire de Douaumont ne seraient pas applicables au Mémorial de Vimy puisque celui-ci ne jouit pas de l'extraterritorialité, il est donc soumis à la législation française.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 19:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne peux pas répondre à cette question dans chacune des discussions que vous avez initiées. J'ai répondu ici. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 22:37, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Si la loi française permettait de garder ces images alors les administrateurs de Commons n'auraient pas permis la suppression des images du même type qui avaient été insérées pour le mémorial de Beaumont-Hamel et l'ossuaire de Douaumont.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 09:17, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Dozens of images of this same memorial were all nominated for deletion individually, rather than as a group, and the nominations occurred over the course of a few days (so they don't even all appear listed one after one another at Commons:Deletion requests). The numerous nominations cover much of the content of Category:Canadian National Vimy Memorial. Notwithstanding efforts to try and consolidate discussion, substantive discussion of the issues is spread across five or six separate discussions. Moreover, threshold of originality and de minimis issues have been raised in respect of some specific images. Could anyone closing the discussions please ensure that they deal with all of the nominated images, have read all of the discussions and have addressed all the various relevant issues in their closing remarks, such that no one's comments are overlooked and we have a comprehensive decision that deals with everything. Thanks.--Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep See my comment here Its a pity this DR is so badly disjointed. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:23, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment please read this [[2]] on the French Wikipédia.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 09:05, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jean, it's frustrating because you don't seem to give other editors the courtesy of reading their comments. You keep posting information about freedom of panorama. FOP is not the issue, as has been explained to you in some detail. As I have explained to you, and even Leoboudv points out above, the discussion is over the concept of collective work under French copyright law. Sorry, but your link to the French Wikipédia blog is not relevant. It deals with issues that are not in dispute here. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There is no FOP in France FASTILY 11:05, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Vimy_Ridge_Memorial_WWI_impoverished_figures_close_up.JPG&oldid=575667735"