Commons:Deletion requests/File:View of Takatsuki city 3.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipediaをやめることにしたため Monadaisuki (talk) 14:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant : This picture is not used from any pages. Monadaisuki (talk) 05:54, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: This file is in use on ja:Portal:日本の都道府県/大阪府/新着画像ギャラリー/新着画像保管庫2012年3月分, so it's not redundant. --bjh21 (talk) 12:54, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Copyright violation" Sorry, I got this picture from other site. This picture is not mine. Monadaisuki (talk) 04:23, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no new infos, no reason for deletion. see above. Please see COM:LRV. --Wdwd (talk) 11:57, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not the copyright holder of this picture. I stole this picture from other site. COM:LRV is no valid reason to keep it. Monadaisuki (talk) 16:47, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. All their uploads were originally tagged as をやめることにしたため (Google Translate: "Because I decided to quit"). So this user simply wants to remove all their images from Commons. Because courtesy deletion is no longer possible, (s)he now merely changes tactics to get the image deleted and claims copyvio, which is likely not the case (most of their uploads are taken with same camera in the same general area). This particular image is in scope and in use. --P 1 9 9   15:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]