Commons:Deletion requests/File:Une partie du terminal conteneur.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Une partie du terminal conteneur.jpg

[edit]

parce que je m'en fou 87.66.147.161 14:36, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not a deletion reason. However, it is a small file without EXIF, so that's problematic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:01, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello Ikan Kekek, the statement is indeed vandalism. Being the photographer behind the image, I can assure you that there are no copyright concerns. Some of the images I have imported indeed do not have EXIF. But, despite the deletion of some of my imports (unjustified because I was the author) and being a professional photographer, I can assure you that I only import files of which I am the author. --Martin-78 (talk) 11:40, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Martin-78, it's great that you are contributing to Commons as a professional, but please go through the COM:VRT process, because assuring me won't change the decision of the closing admin. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:08, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello,
    I'm sysop on the French version I am well aware of the problems of Copyvio. And I don't see where is the problem with this file.
    I am the author, no one has disputed his paternity as far as I know (and that will not happen being the photographer). Martin-78 (talk) 16:24, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    This is not the first time that I do not understand certain deletions on Commons... If it turns out that this photo should be deleted, I would like to know the process to have the photos that I have deleted from Commons. uploaded, this will close the issue defined. Martin-78 (talk) 16:33, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Have you read COM:VRT? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:26, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Indeed, when I had the same problem in 2017 I had done it. Without any response. Martin-78 (talk) 19:42, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Despite this OTRS ticket, the images had been deleted. And personally when a Copyvio is proven, I understand that this poses a problem. But when no evidence is provided to prove that an image is stolen, I admit that I do not understand the process and understand photographers who may be unmotivated to contribute. The present case, for example, remains visibly unanswered. A vandal from Wikipedia-FR launches a deletion request for a really futile reason, and the latter would have a chance of succeeding? Martin-78 (talk) 19:46, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I now understand from a discussion at Commons talk:Deletion requests that small but usable files with no EXIF are not thereby deletable without any other reason, so I think we should assume good faith on the part of the uploader, because Google Images found no matches and TinEye found only this photo itself on Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:23, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 20:44, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Une_partie_du_terminal_conteneur.jpg&oldid=769189470"