Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ulf Larsen and teen girls in amateur porn 19.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Pornography. It does not have any encyclopedic purpose, futhermore related to the section. Veroforus (talk) 16:48, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Delete I thought Commons was not an amateur porn sharing site. E4024 (talk) 16:50, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- There is no doubt that this picture is pornography, that is the reason why it has been uploaded, as there were almost no amateur pornography at Wikimedia Commons. However, if this file is to be deleted, then all of the files under pornography should be removed - see this category.
- I have no objection to the total removal of pornography from Wikimedia Commons, if that is so decided. However I believe that pornography - as long as its within the limits of international accepted law, as my pictures are (no persons under the age of 18, all persons accepted being exposed nude) - is a part of society. If Wikimedia Commons remove pornography, what else could be disturbing for our users? Pictures of weapons and war? Perhaps religious buildings? It could be a long list of various topics that someone would feel offended by.
- This is the so far the third time someone nominate my amateur pornography pics for deletion, the two first failed. Again, it is up to the community to decide if they should be kept or not, and I will not argue more than I have done here regarding keeping them. I do however think that the users and admins should have a general view of this. Either all of my amateur pornography should be deleted, or it should be kept. And if my amateur pornography pictures is deleted I think that it is logical that the community should discuss whether it will accept any pornographic pictures or videos at all. Ulflarsen (talk) 17:00, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Keep per User:Ulflarsen. All images on Commons are intended to be shared because the licenses allow anyone to reuse them for any purpose. The uploader did not upload these photos here with the same intentions as someone might on PornHub. COM:PORN says "[low]-quality pornographic images that do not contribute anything educationally useful to our existing collection of images are not needed on Commons." These images are clearly not low-quality. They are about human sexuality, which is undeniably an educational use for the photos. Considering there are at least 4 billion adults in the world, the people portrayed in these photos can only be minutely representative of all human sexuality. We need many more good-quality photos of humans of all colours, shapes, sizes, and adult ages. FredWalsh (talk) 17:30, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
the image has no encyclopedic purpose 95.249.122.242 15:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Old man's vanity images. IMHO these could and can be speedied as self promotion. That simple. E4024 (talk) 15:15, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Quoting user Fred Walsh "per User:Ulflarsen. All images on Commons are intended to be shared because the licenses allow anyone to reuse them for any purpose. The uploader did not upload these photos here with the same intentions as someone might on PornHub. COM:PORN says "[low]-quality pornographic images that do not contribute anything educationally useful to our existing collection of images are not needed on Commons." These images are clearly not low-quality. They are about human sexuality, which is undeniably an educational use for the photos. Considering there are at least 4 billion adults in the world, the people portrayed in these photos can only be minutely representative of all human sexuality. We need many more good-quality photos of humans of all colours, shapes, sizes, and adult ages." Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 15:20, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per the first section, Fred Walsh, Jeromi Mikhael, and COM:CENSOR. This is a fatuous nomination. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, on a side note a preference for only professional pornography as I sometimes see in these deletion requests basically gives a one-sided view of the entire industry. If an image has realistic educational value then it should be included. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:52, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
