Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ukranenland 23.JPG

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image shows a wrong image of the museum. It transmitted, especially in Google search without any description a wrong impression. (It is more than 4 years old). The employees are hoping for a deletion, because it's such a wrong picture of their work. Mors certa (talk) 09:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment @Mors certa: the images, which you want to remove, have no real descriptions at the moment (only the name "Ukranenland"), this likely influences their positions in search engines (note: if you primarly want that your own images show up at better positions, you should think about better filenames on your own website, but please don't expect others to delete their images). Please read Commons:Help_desk/Archive/2016/09#Deletion_of_Pictures_.22Ukranenland.22 and especially Prosfilaes's hint there. Contextualizing the images by improving their descriptions is the best: you could add something more exact like {{de|Flutschäden im Ukranenland-Museum im Jahr …}} or {{de|Haus im Ukranenland-Museum während Renovierungsarbeiten 2012}}. Please understand that we generally do not delete images only because they show an old status of something. It is well within our scope to document history. Or, in other words, should we delete every old image of demolished or renovated buildings? Would you really want that Wikipedia has no images like this because the church looks different today? I hope not. Holger1959 (talk) 10:32, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:21, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]