Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tower of the Sun in Osaka.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Japan specifically mentions this structure as an "artistic work", and in Japan, photos of these may only be used non-commercially.  fetchcomms 05:33, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This file was nominated for deletion on 5 April 2010(2010-04-05), but was kept. Please consider the decision made in there. Laitr Keiows (talk) 08:10, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above keep reasons and this DR Jcb (talk) 23:38, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Tower of the Sun in Osaka.jpg

Copyvio. Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle etc.

Ones who wrote Freedom_of_panorama#Japan definitely know Japanese copyright law and they say that Japanese copyright law states that "architectural works located in open places accessible to the public, such as streets and parks, may be photographed and the photos may be reproduced for any purposes". Laitr Keiows (talk) 05:06, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Something may look like a building in some ways, and still be classified legally as an "artistic work", not an "architectural work". Classification might be difficult in this case - except the decision has been made by a Japanese copyright lawyer using it as an example of an "artistic work" building. Case closed. Rd232 (talk) 07:56, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment What that copyright lawyer said doesn't stand my argument that comes from the corresponding Wikipedia article: "In the tower, there were moving staircases surrounding the tree and a lift which enabled visitors to go to the upper floor." As you can find out here the tower has at least three floors with numerous elevators and a lift, which surely makes it a building. Laitr Keiows (talk) 08:02, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That article actually opens with Tower of the Sun ... is an artwork created by Japanese artist Tarō Okamoto. And you seem to be under the mistaken impression that an artwork with some qualities of a building cannot be an "artistic work". Per the Japanese copyright lawyer, it can. Rd232 (talk) 08:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete The subject of the image is actually the example at COM:FOP#Japan (and it wasn't added recently, it's been there since at least January 2010). As Jim points out above, this is based on a Japanese copyright lawyer using that example in explaining Japanese FOP. This is a very easy decision. Rd232 (talk) 07:53, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete There is sufficient doubt about the copyright status of these images (especially given the cited legal opinion from an expert). Consequently the precautionary principle should be applied. QU TalkQu 08:55, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete All Wikipedias with articles about the work claim that it is an artwork: "The Tower of the Sun (
    太陽の塔
    Taiyō no Tō?) is an artwork created by Japanese artist Tarō Okamoto." "
    太陽の塔(たいようのとう)は、1970年に大阪府吹田市で開催された日本万国博覧会(EXPO'70・大阪万博)の会場に、芸術家の岡本太郎が制作した芸術作品であり建造物である。
    " "Tower of the Sun er et kunstverk laget av den japanske kunstneren Taro Okamoto og ble plassert i Suita i Osaka i Japan." "Tower of the Sun ((Japansk) 太陽の塔 Taiyō no Tō) er et kunstværk lavet af den japanske kunstner Taro Okamoto og er placeret i Osaka, Japan." "La Torre del Sol (太陽の塔 Taiyō no Tou?) es una escultura creada por el artista japonés Tarō Okamoto." (sculptures are artworks by definition) --Stefan4 (talk) 12:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I am currently working to get a permission to use these images freely from The Modern Art Atellier Inc. Please delay deleting this images. Laitr Keiows (talk) 05:20, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment No reply from The Modern Art Atellier yet. Meantime I marked my own images and one older one with [[:Template:Fair use delete|{{uncertain status under COM:FOP#Japan}}]] Laitr Keiows (talk) 03:46, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per my original nomination archived above. This was used as an example of unacceptable content in COM:FOP, so, yeah. fetchcomms 14:31, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted as per above discussion whilst also taking into account Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama/Archive_1#Hideyuki_Murata. russavia (talk) 08:30, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]