Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tony Ricca Profile.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tony Ricca Profile.jpg

[edit]

This file was for an article on Wikipedia that was deleted via AfD there and has no other use. Uploader has been blocked from WP for socking and was suspected of a conflict of interest 2001:8003:5999:6D00:1C33:A67C:6860:91CE 22:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Uploaded for the sole purpose of promotion of the subject and for no other purpose. Uploader is clearly acting on behalf of the subject and is therefore subject to a conflict of interest - already noted on his talk page on Wikipedia. Denial there is suspicious. In fact I hold the belief that this user is the subject concerned. There is no other way this information could have been acquired. Wikimedia in all respects is not a platform for promotion. 118.127.101.18 21:45, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - Outside the scope of WikiCommons under 2.2. No educational value demonstrated. 1.152.108.116 05:13, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • The truth is, I can't even keep track of the numerous discussions going on about this person/subject on the numerous files on numerous projects, all started by the same IP. But I want the THREE Australian IP addresses that are participating in all of them to be investigated for sockpuppetry. And I would like all of the discussions to be either closed due to improper filing or joined into one discussion. There is no reason to hold the same discussion with the same participants on the same subject matter. They are either all usable or not. Quakewoody (talk) 04:14, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
They are not usable and I deny sock puppetry. This is not an improper filing as it is filed as an act of promotion, of which COI is a part. 2001:8003:5999:6D00:D4D:B5BA:2D0A:3835 07:00, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Have you considered voting on that file, to prevent someone from using the same argument over there, and they both end up being deleted as duplicates? Quakewoody (talk)
Kindly do not involve me in your petty dispute that appears to be here as well as on Wikidata. There's a general rule in Wiki that you should apply and so should the 2001 IP. Disengage. I already shut it down on Wikidata (and the article was deleted when I suggested it be kept). Don't encourage me to act in the same way here. I refuse to be involved. I have done all I should need to do. TLPG (talk) 22:35, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
But you involved yourself here. I simply was asking you to voice an opinion on the "duplicate" you mentioned.
Also, I did think it was odd that you asked for it to be kept - but it was removed. And without any real discussion/reason given as to why. Quakewoody (talk) 00:03, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
PROVE IT!! And your vote is biased due to your COI! 2001:8003:5999:6D00:4937:65BF:56A5:5D27 06:52, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:17, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Tony_Ricca_Profile.jpg&oldid=372075663"