Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Residence.JPG

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The_Residence.JPG

Derivative work. Photograph primarily focused on sign, sign prominently features a non-free photograph and a non-free diagram. Dcoetzee (talk) 06:34, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

• 688 square meters max? Quite tight; settle for no less than 5,000. Delete, little foreseeable use even for spam (it's from 2006, the place must be built-up by now). NVO (talk) 18:43, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
• conditionally Keep for historical utility based on the answers to several questions:

Is "historical utility" a reason for keep at Commons? Could it be rehabilitated with CC permission from billboard copyright holder at OTRS and retouching (rm phone number/name, crop watermark)? Licensed, can a photo be kept for future use (say, in an article about development in that area, environment, etc.)? --Lexein (talk) 04:42, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

• • OTRS permission from the billboard copyright holder is not only extremely unlikely but insufficient. The prominent photo is probably from a clipart collection or photo database, and someone else is the copyright holder. It would be a mess to track them all down and totally not worth the effort. Dcoetzee (talk) 05:42, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
    • Drat. Found it here preview.tinyurl.com/3fs4p8a. A much wider shot, or shifted to the side, might have been useful. --Lexein (talk) 06:44, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

---

Deleted: Seems to fall outside the scope of the project. There is no indication of how this can be educational Ben.MQ (talk) 04:34, 24 August 2011 (UTC)