Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tempio di Marte Ultore (Roma) - Laterale.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tempio di Marte Ultore (Roma) - Laterale.jpg

[edit]

Not own work the original photographer can be seen in metadata: "Paris Orlando" 193.146.182.128 11:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC) It is not forbidden, you should read the rules this is an example [1] . Greetings.--NikonZ7II (talk) 11:22, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is not forbidden only if you and the original photographer are the same person yes, but if not, you need permission from the photographer, which is the copyright holder of those works. --193.146.182.133 11:31, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it's me, why should I put someone else's name on it? I don't understand you. Greetings.--NikonZ7II (talk) 11:33, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't necessary you reply with that forms. It's normal that a user thinks that it's probably a copyvio, but if you are the photographer, you can send a mail to VRTS to give a confirmation.--193.146.182.133 11:39, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why should it? It has to be proven that they are not my pictures. Greetings.--NikonZ7II (talk) 11:48, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You have just say that you are the same person as the photographer, so it's your responsability to prove that they are your files, a VRTS mail is a recommended option.--193.146.182.133 11:49, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Accusing without evidence is not helpful. We'll see what they say. Greetings.--NikonZ7II (talk) 11:57, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
YOU HAVE JUST SAY THAT YOU ARE THE SAME PERSON AS THE PHOTOGRAPHER (your words: "Of course it's me, why should I put someone else's name on it?"). I believe you, but for prevent others could re-nominate it, it is recommended to confirm that you are the copyright holder via VRTS. You can explain, with this, an evidence that you are the legitimal creator. Because you also don't have any evidence too, unless your own words. --193.146.182.133 12:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Accusing without evidence is not helpful. We'll see what they say. For me finish here.Greetings. NikonZ7II (talk) 12:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am not an administrator or anything, but I'm pretty sure it's not normal practice to go around accusing users of plagiarism. Normally we assume good faith until evidence is shown to the contrary. We should not require NikonZ7II to upload his ID or anything in my opinion. SpartaN (talk) 20:56, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: apparently this is own work. --Strakhov (talk) 13:17, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Tempio_di_Marte_Ultore_(Roma)_-_Laterale.jpg&oldid=689097317"