Commons:Deletion requests/File:Telluric planets size comparison.jpg
Copyright violation. The uploader claims that it is his own work. However, the linked website contains the exact same image. The website clearly states "copyright© lesud™ 2016". There is no evidence of permission for reuse. 86.153.133.193 11:21, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Answer from the owner of the image
There is no copyright violation. I added a text on the website explaining that the pictures are trully in creative Commons licence and I removed the copyright on each picture. The copyright mentions were here by mistake. --Lsmpascal (talk) 13:55, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Copyright issues are not that simple. The website shows a specific copyright status that the copyright is owned by some organisation identified by the initials "LESUD" (and that is a trademark). However, the image pages categorically state that the images are your own work. The copyright status is therefore unclear.
Do you own the website lesud.com? (Which means that you can licence the images if you own the copyright (that is you and not LESUD)).
Did you produce the images for LESUD? (In which case they are claiming that they own the copyright and not you - and you need to resolve this as it currently appears that you do not own the copyright, rightly or wrongly, given that the images certainly appear to have been copied from lesud.com). 86.153.133.193 14:13, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- I own the website lesud.com and the firm "le sud multimedia" lesud.com is the website of. I didn't produce the images espacially for lesud. this site is the place I was used to publish some of my work. I published them on this site a few time before I published them on wikimedia. As I always do, I added a copyright on them, and I forgot to remove it after their publication on wikimedia.
To be clear I removed the copyright on the images on lesud.com and added a text on our current issue. May I do something more to prove these pictures are not a cr violation ? Let me know, I will do it.
.--Lsmpascal (talk) 14:34, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep -- comment by Lsmpascal clears up the copyright state controversy for me. Mscuthbert (talk) 20:53, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per comment by Lsmpascal. Mightymights (talk) 13:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:27, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
